Sunday, April 17, 2011

Dear Publishers: Why Do I Need You?

As an author, you slave and slave over your manuscript until it is polished. You then try and convince a publisher to purchase said manuscript. If you are lucky enough to sell it, your publisher has a staff of editors who work with you to bring it to perfection. Once it is ready, the publisher has a vast marketing department who packages your book and develops a comprehensive marketing strategy to sell it for you. Or at least that is the way it used to work.

Last year I attended a panel about non-fiction publishing at CanWrite, the Canadian Authors' Association conference. I heard publisher after publisher talk about how they would like you to include a market analysis of your idea along with strategies for how you are going to sell it. I thought, "wait a second here, isn't that their job?" So naively, I asked them. "Aren't you the professionals who know the market best? Isn't that why I am signing with you?"

I was roundly shut down by all them. "Gosh no," they all said. "You know your market best, because you wrote the book."

Mmmm, no. I'm a writer. Not a marketer. You have marketing staff. But more and more, writers are being asked to do their own marketing, organize their own book tours and signings. Many agents and publishers won't even consider your manuscript if you don't already have an established presence in social media and on the Internet.

As a writer, more of your time is spent on business and less on the creative process itself. You are being expected to do the work your agent or publisher used to do. Recently, Guy Gavriel Kay and Steven Heighton bemoaned this very thing on The Next Chapter with Shelagh Rogers.

Traditionally, self-publishing has been discouraged if you wanted to be taken seriously because generally these books were by authors who weren't really all that good and didn't see the benefit of having a talented editor working with them to help refine their work.  But in today's world, getting signed with a publisher no longer guarantees an editor will touch your book. Editors are being laid off in droves by publishing houses. Many agents and publishers don't want to look at your book unless it has already been edited—yet another expense for the author.

So the question in my mind now is, if my publisher is no longer properly editing my book and no longer marketing my book, what is it that they are doing? Printing it? But with today's technology I can distribute it myself using clever technologies such as ebooks and, for you Luddites who love your hard copy, the Espresso Book Machine. As an author in the 21st century, what does my publisher do for me?

You still can't enter most contests, such as the Giller prize, with a self-published book, but that too will likely change as self-publishing begins to gain respect as more and more good authors give up on publishers who want a cut of sales, but provide little service in return.

The publishing industry is in crisis. Large publishing houses are laying off staff and small presses are closing every day. There is all kinds of blame thrown around, but the general public is still buying and reading books. If I have to write my book, get it edited and market it myself, then why would I sign with you? Publishers might save money in the short term by offloading work to authors, but in doing so they are quickly making themselves obsolete. If publishers are going to survive this brave new world they are going to have to give up on flint knapping and find innovative new ways to work with authors, make the most of modern technology and let authors get back to the job of writing.

So dear publishers, why do I need you? It's a serious question. I don't write for my own pleasure; I want to sell books. How will you help me do that?

7 comments:

  1. This is an interesting perspective. It is time for the "because that's how it is done" model of doing business go away and make room for innovation. The music industry is still reeling from the effect of denial about the changes to their business paradigm. Film and television organizations have adopted a new term, "transmedia," to help deal with the effects of the rise of the prosumer.

    You ask the questions honestly. What value does a publisher bring to the table in a digital age. What service does the publisher offer the writer?

    There is an opportunity here for publishers to re-invent themselves much the way the public library has had to. Sadly, this is an adapt or die situation. The business model for publishing is changing and the publisher as we know it today is headed the way of the manual typesetter; a quaint curiosity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comment. There is nothing new about "adapt or die" in any business. Technology has always pushed us forward. The struggles of the music industry and film and television are examples right on the mark.

    I am confident a solid new business model will emerge in the coming years and those publishers who are forward-thinking will survive and those who aren't will wither away and make room for eager young entrepreneurs with fresh ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, Pam. Mark Williams left a very thoughtful comment on my link to your post. He had the same problems I did logging in to comment here. (Dammit, Blogger!)

    You can read his comments at http://chazzwrites.wordpress.com. (Trying to leave a comment here using just name & URL this time.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Rob! I replied on your page. Mark makes some very good points about some of the advantages traditional publishers still have.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I had the same question a few years back when I heard a panel on "new trends" in publishing at the Editors' Association national conference.

    If publishers are streamlining their process, then why not do it yourself? That is, hire an editor, a designer, a printer...now from your blog, I see an author today even has either to be to hire his or her own publicist and marketer on top of everything else.

    It seems all that's left for these lean and mean publishers to do these days is put their logo on the spine and cover page--and collect their cut.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well it isn't quite that cut and dried. Mark, a successful self-published author, made some good points about some of the advantages large publishers still have. Mark is in the UK and due to US rules he can't post his e-book for sale on Barnes & Noble or Amazon US. As well, he would like to offer the book for sale in other languages and the cost of translation is prohibitive.
    You can read his full comment here.

    For a variety of reasons, publishers are struggling. Like so many industries right now, they are trying to cut costs. Unfortunately, in this digital their current strategies are very quickly making them irrelevant.

    Is this a good thing or a bad thing? Ultimately it is survival of the fittest. There is no value judgment. Some good things will be lost, but others will be gained.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Pam,

    Thanks for summing this up so neatly! You raise a lot of valid points. I've always felt a publisher could do a better job when it comes to distribution and selling foreign rights. It will be interesting to watch what the changing landscape brings.

    Joan Marie Galat www.joangalat.com

    ReplyDelete